Thursday, 16 May 2013

One year on from University - A frustrating 12 months


By Simon Wright

It is staggering to think that I did a dissertation 12 months ago
Today marked the first anniversary of the end of my journalism degree at the University of Northampton.  Time has flown by over the past year, and I won’t lie – the first 12 months since finishing my education have been a frustrating experience.  

Rewind a year, and everything felt so different.  At exactly this time last year, I was around a friend’s house in Northampton having some pre-drinks before heading into town for a final night out to celebrate the end of three years hard work.  Now, as I sit here writing this piece – I do wonder whether putting myself through the University experience was actually worth it.

Rewind to last year
Rewind to 2012 and things were changing fast for me.  I had just handed in my notice to the retail company I had worked for due to not being able to get the local transfer I had been banking on, and the UoN experience was coming very fast towards its final conclusion.

The final few weeks of the course felt strange.  The relaxed approach I was able to adopt in the closing stages of second year wasn’t quite there.  Although my control in assignment deadlines was most definitely still around, the individual in me was working hard to the finish, but looking into an uncertain future.  What would happen once the final assignment was due?  Would I stay in touch with people?  Could I make the full-time media breakthrough I was hoping to achieve? 

When I handed the final piece in, which was all the paperwork and the DVD disc for my TV project (see embedded video), the feeling was one of delight that I had overcome my biggest challenge in conquering University but also a sense of sadness.  It was all over, and all I could do now was wait and hope my hard efforts would be enough to get the results I felt I deserved.


Before that, there was one final journalism night out in town.  We had gone out as a group twice in the final two weeks of second year, but in third year – this hadn’t happened, due to various workloads and friendship groups that either continued to develop or even disintegrate.

The night itself was memorable.  I had a very good time dancing and drinking into the early hours of the next day.  At the end of the day, if you can’t enjoy yourself at this point, you simply won’t enjoy yourself at all in life. 

The aftermath
That evening saw me largely say a final goodbye to the people who I had seen and been with day in, day out for the past three years.  There was the Silverstone Grad Ball, the graduation day itself in July and a couple of personal goodbyes in the weeks to come, but as a group, it was a fitting farewell. 

I always maintain that the group of journalists at the University of Northampton that started with me in 2009 were hungry to succeed in their future careers.  Some had better strengths than others, there were occasional flaws, mental breakdowns, moments of individual doubt but I can generally say I got on with the majority and built up some very close friendships along the way.

Since then, the dreaded ‘distance’ element has got in the way.  Some have drifted out to no contact, but I guess with time, your presence on their lives is simply not needed.  However, I still attempt to keep contact as much as I can (when I have a reliable smartphone that is), and the memories are mainly good.  Even the bad memories, such as the dark periods I had are still remembered.  I guess my memory bank is pretty full for the inevitable autobiography in around two decades times then!

I can honestly say that I’m proud of everyone that graduated, whether that was last July or in February 2013, and a good portion of course buddies have done very well for themselves.  From interning with major radio corporations, succeeding in the PR market with fashion and political departments, to freelancing for now until something more permanent crops up, I think everyone is in a stronger position than they were when arriving at UoN in 2009.

Well done to everyone, and also on this note, congratulations to those who have finished their journalism degrees this year at Northampton.  I hope you all get the results you deserve.

Too many false dawns
For myself, the University experience flew by and so has the past 12 months.  I will admit that I have achieved a lot since last May, but it has sadly brought too many false dawns, a growing sense of frustration and no luck in the full-time market, despite making over 200 job applications ranging from media and journalism, to admin, marketing and even library work.

Less than two weeks after my course finished, I was offered an internship with a football website, which was unpaid but gave me tremendous experience in the online world.  It allowed me to write about one of my main passions, and helped develop my skills as a deputy editor, sub-editor and features writer.  I was disappointed not to receive recognition in terms of payment, and the way things ended before Christmas last year was on a slightly sour note, considering all the hard work I put in.  Although I would change some aspects of how things turned out, I do admit that without this experience, I wouldn’t be in the position I’m in today.

I also tried online radio and talking to the world with a successful Formula One talk show, which began in the closing months of the 2012 season.  This venture ended amicably in January due to an advertising structure which had a high risk element, and was something that I felt was going to be too vulnerable to myself.  I have also written for a student media website, and now have strong freelance positions earning basic pay for another football site, and a strong fee writing holiday guides for a travel website that specialises in updating the weather of destinations across the world.

Kleeneze's business model came very close to getting ugly
The most frustrating experience was attempting to make a go of a business with Kleeneze, which began in February 2013.  I went into this with high hopes of getting an excellent income, and driving strong online sales together with the door-to-door sales in the nearby neighbourhood I live in Milton Keynes.  Eight weeks later, and I had to admit defeat and the business was shutdown, another victim of our recession that never seems to end.  

The online shop was non-existent in terms of profit, and weekly sales figures always came in at a similar total.  Even boosts of crafty leaflets created on InDesign, and new catalogues simply didn’t drive the money in.  All I can say is it was worth a go and it is more experience gained.

However, things ended very messy with the company themselves.  My ‘sponsor’ didn’t help me whatsoever and promised me things that simply never came off.  He was absolutely useless.  

Also, when I went to close everything down, Kleeneze insisted I should pay them another £90 for the next two months despite not doing anything for them!  I was absolutely furious, and although this matter has now been resolved after drawing up a letter of complaint, the situation could have got very ugly.  However, if anyone is thinking of starting a business with commission bonuses, don’t do it and I certainly do not recommend Kleeneze as a viable business structure. 

What will happen next?
Despite the hundreds of applications I have made, I have only been shortlisted for two interviews.  One was last month in Northampton, and one was in Lancaster in February.  I have updated, tweaked and restructured my approach to applying for various positions, and now have had three career meetings with the National Careers Service to see if I can make the breakthrough I am looking for.

Full-time work in media was always going to be hard, because of the competition levels in the sector, but I have to be honest, I really expected to have landed something by now.  I considered a postgraduate degree in January, but this route has been shut off due to not being able to get the required funding.  In recent weeks, I decided I will start writing a book during the summer and have also considered going abroad and maybe do some travelling for a year.  This is a backup plan, but should I be in the same position as autumn arrives in the UK, this will become a viable and probable option.

Do I regret going to University?  No, when I think of the friends I made and the valuable life experiences gained, but there is a small tinge of regret that things haven’t gone the way I hope they would have.  It shows that even a 2:1 degree is not easy to break those doors down to the job of your dreams.

The last 12 months have been tough, but I'm still smiling!
In summary, it is staggering how quickly a year has gone since I finished University.  As I come from the critical mould, I would say: “Trying hard, feel frustrated, but must not give up.”

Not yet anyway.  After all, I have a habit of being knocked back and getting up again to conquer the world of media.  The last 12 months have been frustrating, but I still have friends, family and my health to be thankful for, so it could be much worse.

2013 Spanish Grand Prix – Alonso comes out on top in tyre bore


By Simon Wright

Fernando Alonso delighted his home crowd with a flawless display
Spanish superstar Fernando Alonso (pictured) delighted his home crowd on Sunday, as he powered to victory in a Spanish Grand Prix where preserving tyres took severe precedence.

Despite only starting from fifth on the grid, the double world champion was in commanding form on raceday, leading proceedings from just after the first round of pitstops, to take the chequered flag in Barcelona ahead of Kimi Raikkonen by nearly 10 seconds.  It is his second win of the season, and made up for the disappointment of the DRS issues that spoiled his race in Bahrain three weeks earlier.

Felipe Massa made it a double celebration for Ferrari with his first rostrum finish of the season, with points being scored by British drivers Paul di Resta and Jenson Button.  However, it was a miserable afternoon for the Mercedes team, who saw their drivers slip from the front row of the grid down the order into the midfield.

Taking the most severe criticism though was Pirelli.  Four pitstops was the race winning strategy, and over 80 tyre stops were made throughout the race.  Drivers have complained viciously about the 2013 compounds, and now fans are getting confused and the media analysts have stuck the knife into the Italian’s tyre structures.  Under so much pressure, Pirelli motorsport director Paul Hembrey has announced changes to the compounds will be made in time for next month’s Canadian Grand Prix, but he is facing tough scrutiny over his role, which has seen tyre management overtake the racing spectacle by some distance in the opening quarter of the 2013 season.

Failures on the cars of di Resta and Vergne have put Pirelli in a risky position
Pirelli should also be concerned by the safety of their tyres.  Following issues for Lewis Hamilton and Massa (twice) in Bahrain, di Resta (car pictured) suffered a scary delamination on the start-finish straight in Friday practice.  In the race itself, Jean-Eric Vergne was victim to a failure, although Hembrey blamed the driver for this incident.  Vergne had an unfortunate clash in the pits with Nico Hulkenberg, but his tyre problem came on a brand new set of tyres from his Toro Rosso.

On Saturday, Mercedes proved they have the fastest car at the moment on a single lap.  Nico Rosberg took his second successive pole position, with Hamilton completing a front row lockout for the Silver Arrows. 

When the lights went out, Rosberg held onto his lead, but Hamilton was under pressure from the off, and was forced to concede second spot to world champion Sebastian Vettel.  Seconds later, he was ambushed by Alonso, who had been squeezed out into turn one, but then produced an outstanding move around the outside of both Raikkonen and the Brit in turn three to take third spot.

Rosberg managed to keep his narrow advantage in the first stint, but Alonso stopped on lap nine and used his fresher rubber to clear current championship leader Vettel.  Later, it was detected he had a slow puncture on his first set of tyres, and unlike the damaged front wing which ended his Malaysian Grand Prix in March, Ferrari played safe and brought the Spaniard in.  This time, they made the right decision.

Shortly after the first stint, Alonso utilised his speed and tyre advantage to drive past Rosberg for the lead, and the German wouldn’t become much of a factor in the outcome.  Very quickly, he meekly surrendered position to Vettel, a flying Massa and Raikkonen.

His team-mate was in even more dire straits.  His pace was poor from the beginning, and both Raikkonen and Massa overtook in the second DRS zone before the first round of pitstops.  A slow first pitstop dropped him further back into the clutches of the midfield pack, and his frustration was clear when he was overtaken on lap 27 by the Williams of Pastor Maldonado.

He yelled on his team radio: “I’ve been overtaken by a Williams.”

When his team asked him to protect the tyres even more, his response was short but accurate, saying: “I can’t go any slower.”

Ultimately, he finished a lapped 12th.  Rosberg somehow persisted on three stops to sixth, but over a minute behind race winner Alonso.

Massa managed to jump Vettel in the second round of pitstops, and it became clear that like in Australia, the Red Bull cars were using their tyres faster than Ferrari and Lotus.  On lap 33, Raikkonen produced a beautiful pass on Vettel into the first corner to claim third place and his chassis was able to protect its tyres better than the Ferrari.  A sluggish third stint from Massa cost him second place to the Finn, who closed the gap on Vettel at the top of the championship.

No-one could get near Alonso though, who cruised to his third victory in Spain and his second triumph around the Circuit de Catalunya, having first won his home event for Renault back in 2006.

Raikkonen’s fourth podium of the season takes him to within four points of the title lead, while Massa achieved only his third top three result in the last three years.  Red Bull salvaged fourth and fifth from a tough day.  Mark Webber made his customary dreadful start and slumped from seventh on the grid to 14th by the first corner.  An early pitstop on lap seven got him out of traffic and into a lonely fifth spot which he held for most of the rest of the afternoon.

Di Resta did well to finish seventh on a circuit that was never going to suit the strengths of the Force India.  Team-mate Adrian Sutil’s day was ruined by a lengthy first pitstop and left him trailing home in an unlucky 13th.  Another driver out of luck was Romain Grosjean, whose rear suspension failed at low speed on the ninth lap, ending his afternoon prematurely.

Upgrades made to the McLaren package didn’t see the team make the step forward they had expected.  Jenson Button labelled the team’s performance as ‘embarrassing,’ after finishing a distant eighth, but he was only 17th after the first circuit.  Team-mate Sergio Perez followed him home, after a better weekend which saw him outqualify his team leader for the first time in 2013.  The final point went to Daniel Ricciardo in the Toro Rosso, holding off Esteban Gutierrez, who led a race for the first time in his career and set fastest lap.  Britain’s Max Chilton finished last again, but maintained his 100 per cent reliability record.

The prestigious event of Monte Carlo is the next event on the calendar, and it will be an acid test for Pirelli on the tyres that are dictating the show far too much.  As for the championship, it is already looking like a three-way fight for supremacy between Red Bull, Ferrari and Lotus – led by Vettel, Raikkonen and Alonso.

FORMULA 1 GRAN PREMIO DE ESPANA 2013 RESULT
Pos
Driver
Team
Laps
Time/Reason
Grid
1
Fernando Alonso
Ferrari
66
1hr 39min 16secs
5
2
Kimi Raikkonen
Lotus Renault
66
+9.3secs
4
3
Felipe Massa
Ferrari
66
+26.0secs
9
4
Sebastian Vettel
Red Bull Racing Renault
66
+38.2secs
3
5
Mark Webber
Red Bull Racing Renault
66
+47.9secs
7
6
Nico Rosberg
Mercedes GP
66
+1min 08.0secs
1
7
Paul di Resta
Force India Mercedes
66
+1min 08.9secs
10
8
Jenson Button
McLaren Mercedes
66
+1min 19.5secs
14
9
Sergio Perez
McLaren Mercedes
66
+1min 21.7secs
8
10
Daniel Ricciardo
Scuderia Toro Rosso Ferrari
65
1 Lap
11
11
Esteban Gutierrez
Sauber Ferrari
65
1 Lap
19
12
Lewis Hamilton
Mercedes GP
65
1 Lap
2
13
Adrian Sutil
Force India Mercedes
65
1 Lap
13
14
Pastor Maldonado
Williams Renault
65
1 Lap
17
15
Nico Hulkenberg
Sauber Ferrari
65
1 Lap
15
16
Valtteri Bottas
Williams Renault
65
1 Lap
16
17
Charles Pic
Caterham Renault
65
1 Lap
22
18
Jules Bianchi
Marussia Cosworth
64
2 Laps
20
    19
Max Chilton
Marussia Cosworth
64
2 Laps
21
    R
Jean-Eric Vergne
Scuderia Toro Rosso Ferrari
52
Accident Damage
12
    R
Giedo van der Garde
Caterham Renault
21
Lost Wheel
18
  . R
Romain Grosjean
Lotus Renault
      8           
Rear Suspension Failure
6

Drivers’ Championship after 5 rounds: 1. Sebastian Vettel 89, 2. Kimi Raikkonen 85, 3. Fernando Alonso 72, 4. Lewis Hamilton 50, 5. Felipe Massa 45, 6. Mark Webber 42, 7. Romain Grosjean 26, 8. Paul di Resta 26, 9. Nico Rosberg 22, 10. Jenson Button 17, 11. Sergio Perez 12, 12. Daniel Ricciardo 7, 13. Adrian Sutil 6, 14. Nico Hulkenberg 5, 15. Jean-Eric Vergne 1

Constructors’ Championship after 5 rounds: 1. Red Bull Racing 131, 2. Ferrari 117, 3. Lotus 111, 4. Mercedes GP 72, 5. Force India 32, 6. McLaren 29, 7. Scuderia Toro Rosso 8, 8. Sauber 5

Wednesday, 1 May 2013

Ayrton Senna - Was the Brazilian the greatest of all-time?

By Simon Wright

Today marks the 19th anniversary of the passing of one of Formula One’s greatest ever drivers, Ayrton Senna (pictured).

The three-time world champion was a national hero in Brazil, at a time where the country wasn’t experiencing the best of periods.  For many locals, he brought the nation together, and his 41 Grand Prix victories all had their own special moments.

Not everyone endeared themselves to Senna’s ability.  His ruthlessness and determination to win led to some high-profile controversial moments.

The feud with Alain Prost pushed Grand Prix racing into the sporting limelight in the late 80s and early 90s.  There were the regular run-ins with the flamboyant FISA president Jean-Marie Balestre, and raging battles with the likes of Nigel Mansell, Nelson Piquet and in his final days, Michael Schumacher.

One of F1’s unanswered questions we will never know will be whether Senna at his peak, aged 34 could have defeated the young wonder in Schumacher.  Certainly, the Benetton Ford package at the start of 1994 had the upper hand on the evil-handling Williams Renault FW16.  It was Schumacher 20, Senna 0 in points heading to Imola.

However, the Brazilian persisted with a car that was certainly not to his liking, and was dominant all weekend at the San Marino Grand Prix meeting.  He was leading going into lap seven and then, he perished at one of F1’s most feared corners at the time, Tamburello.


What made him so great?
There were two great qualities for me that made Senna stand out from the normal driver.  They were the wet weather ability and the amount of pole positions he collected in his career.

When the rain comes down, some drivers have the ability to make the genuine difference.  Jean Alesi, Wolfgang von Trips, Schumacher and Lewis Hamilton have shown their quality in tricky conditions throughout their careers, but there was something uniquely different about Senna.

The first signs came in his debut season in 1984, when he charged around the streets of Monte Carlo in filthy weather.  From 12th on the grid, he took the underpowered Toleman unit into second place, with some brave and devilish overtaking.  Had it not been for a slightly convenient red flag, he probably would have caught Prost in the McLaren and won the race.

A year later, the Brazilian transferred to the Lotus stable and in Portugal, just his second race for them, he destroyed the competition in wet weather lapping all but one car.

It was the first of his victories, and he repeated his skill when the skies opened on several more occasions.

His first lap at Donington on a damp, dull Easter weekend in 1993 is in my mind, the greatest first lap I’ve ever seen in Grand Prix racing.  The skill, the commitment and the delicate approach he would take in the wet was masterful.

From the start of the Lotus days, Senna’s ability to be the fastest over a single flying lap became legendary.  There were times where he would still set laps much faster than other competitors, even when he had to deal with slow moving EuroBrun or Coloni cars infront (two of the hard-trying backmarker teams in the late 1980s).

He achieved 65 pole positions, the last one coming on Saturday, 30 April 1994 – a day before he paid the ultimate price.  Schumacher has beaten this figure, but it took him 15 years to do it, and Sebastian Vettel has every chance nowadays to top this list.

However, neither can compare to what Senna could do on a quick lap.  Don’t forget, these were the days of qualifying cars, monstrous V12 engines, and having to make manual gear changes on a regular basis.

And one record that still remains is his six victories around Monaco.  At Monte Carlo, he was almost virtually unbeatable.

The detractors
His ruthless approach to winning sometimes cost Senna, and it didn’t win him many friends.
The feud with Prost which started when they became McLaren team-mates in 1988 was gold dust for the race promoters and the neutral spectators.  At a time where if you weren’t in a McLaren, you could forget winning – they produced some classic battles.

Senna frightened Prost when he drove him towards the pitwall in Portugal in 1988, but that was only the start of things to come.

He didn’t make any friends for breaking an agreement made at his behest with Prost at Imola in 1989.

Senna wanted the pair to agree on whoever led off the startline to win the race.  On the restart after Gerhard Berger’s fiery accident, The Professor got the better getaway, but Senna broke the agreement into Tosa on the first circuit, broke away and won the race by miles.

Prost refused to attend the press conference and the cordial relationship was over – similar to what is happening at Red Bull in today’s paddock.

No-one will forget the clashes at Suzuka in 1989 and 1990.  Some feel Senna was harshly treated in 1989 when he was disqualified for receiving outside assistance.  In 1990, he had enough of the bickering, and pulled off a dangerous move that could have had worse consequences.

So annoyed the pole position had been moved onto the dirtier side of the track, he vowed to punish Prost if he turned into the first corner first.  That’s exactly what happened, and the result was catastrophic.

The pair ended in the gravel, and into the tyres.  They strapped themselves out of their cars, neither talking to the other and Senna was hiding a massive secret.

He had deliberately crashed into Prost, but that was something he only admitted after wrapping up his third title in 1991.

There will be those detractors, who will never forgive him for this act of frankly disgusting driving, but everyone has made mistakes, and most have some kind of darker side or done something we are not proud of, but at the time thought it was okay.

Was he the best?
It is almost impossible to declare who is the greatest Grand Prix driver of all-time?  

Schumacher might have most of the records, but then Prost was the most measured, Juan Manuel Fangio the best in an era where you had a 50 per cent of dying, Jim Clark was the best when it came to protecting an inter-team relationship, Fernando Alonso the best when it comes to consistently getting the job done, no matter the equipment at his disposal.

So I don’t want to make comparisons, considering these were different eras, different cars, different circuits and different safety regulations.  However, in his prime – Ayrton Senna was the best of his generation.

When he died at the wheel of the Williams on Sunday, 1 May 1994 – he became a legend that will never ever be forgotten, no matter of the legacy he left.

19 years on – F1 has moved on, but devoted fans will always remember Senna’s personality and genius behind the wheel of a racing car.

Wednesday, 24 April 2013

The state of finances in 21st century football

By Simon Wright

Finances in football have been an exception to the economic climate
IN A PERIOD WHERE MANY OF US HAVE HAD TO MAKE SACRIFICES IN THE ECONOMIC WORLDWIDE RECESSION, THE GAME OF FOOTBALL CONTINUES TO DEFY THE NORM.  NEW PARACHUTE PAYMENT AGREEMENTS FOR PREMIER LEAGUE CLUBS WHO LOSE THEIR TOP FLIGHT STATUS, PLUS EXTREMELY HIGH PLAYER WAGES HAVE LED TO QUESTION MARKS OVER THE STRUCTURE OF FINANCIAL FAIR PLAY.

BUT HOW DO FINANCES AFFECT THE SMALLER CLUBS, WHO ARE ALWAYS BATTLING TO SURVIVE, AND HAS FOREIGN OWNERSHIP BEEN A GOOD THING FOR THE ENGLISH GAME.  FREELANCE JOURNALIST SIMON WRIGHT INVESTIGATES.

Last week, a new parachute payment agreement was made for Premier League clubs who end up being relegated.  They will receive an excess of £60m over a four-year period from next season, replacing the current structure that sees £48m received over four years by current Championship sides who were in the Premier League as late as 2009.

This means the likes of Reading and QPR are set to earn fortunes despite being demoted to the second tier of English football.  It is a system that has come under scrutiny, with the current Rochdale boss Keith Hill saying last September when in charge of Barnsley: “I’ve never been rewarded for doing anything wrong or being relegated.  Clubs that get relegated get rewarded financially, how does that make sense?”

Football fan Laura Jones agrees with Hill’s viewpoint on parachute payments in the game.  She told me: “I agree with Keith that parachute payments are rewarding the failure of Premier League teams.  The increase to £60m, plus whatever the club makes whilst in the Premier League allows the team to retain higher quality players.  These become perpetual yo-yo clubs.”

Sports finance specialist Rob Wilson from Sheffield Hallam University told BBC Sport: “The bigger increase in parachute payment should, by rights, help the transition for any club that gets relegated to the Championship.  What it will also do is make it a little bit more difficult for other clubs in the Championship to compete.

It is hard to find anyone who agrees with the parachute payment structure, but it is difficult to find an alternative that will cater for all parties.

The explosion in player wages
Questions have been raised about the explosion in player wages, with many believing the annual wage per week of a footballer is far too excessive.

Manchester United’s Wayne Rooney received a public backlash from his own supporters when he stated a shock desire to leave the club in October 2010 for ‘lacking ambition,’ then he changed his mind and signed a new contract, earning a seemingly ridiculous sum of £250,000 a week.

Lower league expert Lee Cloke spoke to myself, and feels a better equality needs to be put in place when it comes to player wages.

He stated: “Player wages are at an astounding high and are only going to continue to increase unless a wage cap is put into place.

“Of course, those playing in the Premier League are going to receive more than those in League One and Two, I don’t think that’s ever going to change, but there needs to be some sort of fairness and equality installed when it comes to footballers wages – they’re all doing the same job after all.”

Foreign investment has its perks and negatives
There was a time when clubs were well-run by owners who respected the football business, and were able to handle finances accordingly.  This all changed when Roman Abramovich bought Chelsea in 2003, and was followed shortly afterwards by the likes of the Glazer family at Manchester United, and Randy Lerner at Aston Villa.

Some foreign takeovers have been successful, as fans of Manchester City and PSG can vouch for.  Others like Malaga saw them enjoy brief flirtations with massive sums, followed by financial meltdown.

So, has foreign investment been a good or bad thing for the game due to the wealth of money being piled in.  Sheffield Wednesday supporter Laura feels it runs both ways.

She said: “I think you can argue a case for both sides.  Without foreign investment, some clubs would already be extinct.

“The distinction has to be between a foreign investor who wants to run clubs like a business and those that just want a hobby.  The Venky’s (at Blackburn Rovers) spring to mind.

“The biggest effect on English football has been the creation of the Premier League.  Its financial gravitational pull has changed the face of football.”

Fighting on against adversity
The English football landscape has changed immensely since the Premier League’s inception in 1992, and in recent years, some former club’s from the elite have suffered massively through bad financial mismanagement.

2008 FA Cup winners Portsmouth have suffered immeasurably, with two lengthy stints in administration and were on the brink of liquidation on several occasions.  Luckily, the ownership of the club is now with the fans, and there might be a future at Fratton Park after all.

Coventry City recently slipped back into administration, a move that has left Coventry fans feeling angry about how the Sky Blues have been run in recent years by owners SISU.

It is worse for Bury, who reportedly need around £1m within the next fortnight, or they face potentially going out of business, whilst clubs like Scarborough, Chester City and Rushden & Diamonds were liquidated due to the financial pressures in the game.

Lee Cloke is a fan of struggling League Two outfit Torquay United, and admits the Gulls have had to be extremely careful with its finances.

He said: “We don’t spend any money that we don’t have, and that has sometimes been the difference between promotion and a disappointing early play-off exit.

“We were fortunate enough to have had a fan (Paul Bristow) who won the lottery in 2010 and invested heavily in the club.  His money helped the club to build a new all-seated stand and invest in new training facilities for both the first-team and academy.

“Torquay is by no means a poor club, but most certainly is one that is careful with its money.”

Where will football finance be in the future?
UEFA’s introduction of Financial Fair Play has come into force already.  Due to financial irregularities, Malaga have been expelled from playing in European competition next season, whilst other clubs like reigning UEFA Super Cup holders Atletico Madrid and Fenerbahce had prize money withheld last September as investigations began about their financial conduct.

With television money from the likes of ITV, BSkyB and now, BT Vision pouring in with every passing season, along with more takeovers on a foreign landscape, there is a question to say whether football will be in a better financial position in five years time.

Lee thinks not, adding: “I’d like to think that there would be a huge change and rethink in the structure of finances within football in order to make it fairer for all involved.

“I love football, I always have and I always will, but the money involved in the game has been slowly ruining it over the last 20 years.

“It pains me to say, but in five years time, I see football in an even worse place than it is now, with the more appealing clubs under mass investment and the smaller clubs wallowing in the dark with lack of funds and lack of support.”

Laura Jones added: “I think that is a question for the end of the next financial year to see how financial fair play has affected clubs, if they have affected them at all.”

As ticket prices continue to rise, along with the massive fees in television contracts, and the huge packages players receive on every new contract, football risks itself becoming a total exception to the rule of cutting costs and saving in a time where the average individual is making more cutbacks than ever before.

Should the government get involved, or could the national governing bodies ensure a slightly fairer system for all clubs in England at least? 

These are questions for another day.  However, football risks alienating supporters and followers away from the game if it continues on the path of potential financial destruction.